Coffee on the Nairobi Coffee Exchange
Posted on May 27, 2008 | Filed Under Value | Leave a Comment
While many, including K&R’s own GM of Business Development, might argue that coffee could not possibly be a commodity (bought primarily on price), at the wholesale level it is. Recent news from the Nairobi Coffee Exchange (NCE) provides some simple examples from coffee sales that can be transferred to information technology sales. In short, when does “commodity” not necessarily mean “inexpensive” – or even “the same”?
What happened on the NCE?
A recent Business Daily Africa article noted that weekly auction prices for coffee were up six weeks in a row, to a 12-year high. This is interesting, and the price rise is attributed in the article first to the fact that coffee is not considered discretionary by consumers. Like commuting costs, coffee costs are “mandatory”, and sales do not contract in response to price increases. One of the things about non-discretionary purchases is that if your offerings fit this description, someone will get the sale. For sellers, that’s a real plus.
Lesson 1: Your first task as a IT seller is to convince the buyer that your offering is mandatory, not discretionary. Well-known external, regulatory-based examples of this include HIPPA compliance and Basel II (Sarbanes-Oxley) compliance. Another “mandatory” class of fixes came around Y2K. Internally-driven goals (from annual reports, for example), can become mandatory because they are public. So first, do what you can to make it mandatory for the buyer to have a solution. That solves half of the problem – the business will close. But who will win it? If the solution is a true commodity, your odds of winning are strongly related to your price.
Back to the NCE. The second pressure on prices was a perceived lack of future supply on the New York Futures market. A mandatory item, limited supply, higher prices. That’s interesting, but a single seller can’t usually control this (or they would be a monopoly). As a seller, how do you prevent your offering from being a “commodity” if you can’t control supply?
On the NCE, coffee is sold by grade. The top grade, AA, was selling for between $168 and $353 per 50-kilogram bag. That’s a wide price range for a commodity. If even a similarly-graded commodity (raw coffee beans) can change in price by over 100%, how do they do it? And how can a technology seller learn from that?
In the IT space, an offering is a commodity if buyers feel that they can choose the same thing from several (or many) suppliers. While it is true that this will generally make the negotiation appear to be about price, we’ll offer a different perspective. The true negotiation is about how good a job the sellers do in dispelling the buyer’s belief that “the same thing” is available from several sources. If the seller fails at this task, then the final negotiation will be largely pre-determined, over price, and in the buyer’s favor.
On the NCE, the answer lies in “non-graded” aspects of the beans. Depending on the bean, additional descriptors can be added: “fair trade”, “shade grown”, “sustainable”, or “organic”. The local diner may not care about these descriptions. The local coffee roaster will, as will their “more discriminating” clientele. Using these characteristics, which add uniqueness, will turn a commodity at $168/bag into a commodity at $353/bag.
Lesson 2: Understand your buyer and the buyer’s true interests. Using this knowledge, you will almost always be able to describe your solution in ways that are unique, which will in turn move you toward “high priced commodity” status. This in turn will result in more revenue and more money for you. (TD)
About This Page
You are currently browsing the Negotiation and the News blog archives for May, 2008.
Recently
- The Dynamics of Credibility and Leverage
- If You Don’t Listen, You Can’t Win: Positive Attitudes for Effective Global Negotiators
- The Principles of International Negotiation: Finding Universal Value in a Complex World
- Define Value, Win Credibility and Respect at the Negotiation Table
- Shaping Your Value Argument
- Negotiation Tactics: Discovering the Hidden Value in Client Requests
- Negotiation Leverage to Win Deals
- K&R Negotiations Adds Operational, Business Development and Analytical Expertise to Drive Client Success
- Overcoming Negotiation "Dealbreakers": K&R’s MID Chart of Goals™
- Negotiation and Leadership
Categories
- Credibility
- International Negotiation
- K&R Success Stories
- K&R Workshops
- Leverage
- Motivations, Objectives, Requirements
- Negotiation Skills
- Negotiation Strategy
- Negotiation Success Range™ (NSR™)
- News
- Opportunity Forensics
- Persuasion
- Principled Concessions™
- Principles of International Negotiation
- Questions & Answers
- Risk
- Selling
- Six Principles™
- Tactics
- Terms Cost Money
- Value
- Value Articulation
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- August 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007